Todd Denniston wrote: > Message: 10 > Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:01:59 -0400 > From: Todd Denniston <Todd.Denniston@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Fedora-10 nightmare update2 > To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases > <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx> > Message-ID: <49ECFEE7.5060802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > <SNIP> > > Question: > if you do > taskset -p 0x00000002 \ > `ps aux |grep /usr/bin/Xorg| \ > grep -v grep |awk '{print $2}'` > > {painful way to get the X pid to feed to taskset, which suggests to the kernel > keep the X process on the second processor.} > > and then run your tests, does the problem seem less troublesome at the lower > speeds? > >-- > Todd Denniston > Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane) > Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter > "..painful way to get the...", - not when you wrote it. But to compose anything like that oneself, - that is painful ;) But it did not improve. pid 3467's current affinity mask: 3 pid 3467's new affinity mask: 2 ( did try it the other way around as one core has a higher temperature then the other ) ..think the load was 5% on one, and 30% on the other.. approx. At 800MHz, there are pauses of several seconds. Changed the 'time of day' to show seconds, and it passed a few numbers as it caught up again. What I don't understand is there are many other machines like this, - is there something broken with my hardware ? But in 'top', it is somewhat clear that Xorg is eating time.. Thanks Todd, your code worked as a charm. The others may have missed one of those '' //ARNE -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list