On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 11:26 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> You do realize that I was quoting >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Beland/Bugzilla_Legend >> >> right? > > You do realize that the page you quoted is a draft done by another > contributor, which hasn't been approved that I'm aware of? I mean, I > could quote you graffiti from the alley of the library, doesn't make it > Shakespeare. On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2009-04-21, 16:26 GMT, Ian Pilcher wrote: >> You do realize that I was quoting >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Beland/Bugzilla_Legend > > And do you realize that it is still in User namespace, so it is > just Beland's draft, which was never discussed, approved, or made > official, right? And so continues the defensive posturing from the @redhat.com address space. Like sand through the hour-glass... Why is b.r.c even accessible publicly? Just keep the thing behind the firewalls, rename it utopia.redhat.com, close everything NOTABUG, and don't ever get feedback from users again. :-) jerry -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
