On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 17:08 -0400, Christopher Beland wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 13:50 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > Unless the message you are replying to has a Reply-to: header, it sounds > > > like a bug. > > > > The reply-to header shouldn't affect that. It is an alternate to replying > > to the address in the from header. It doesn't replace addresses in the > > cc list when replying to all. > > When I get messages in Evolution with reply-to headers from a mailing > list, I have to manually add back any addresses that are not in that > header, even if I hit "reply to all". This seems like a feature, not a > bug, which prevents people from replying-to-all inappropriately (if the > header is used well). Whenever possible in Evo I use Ctrl-L (Reply to List), precisely because it *doesn't* reply to all the CC's. I consider this the default list etiquette unless someone explicitly asks for a reply off-list. poc -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list