On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Christopher Beland wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:55 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > i asked about this before (buried in the midst of another post), but
> > with the alpine mailer, if i reply and state explicitly that i want to
> > reply to *all* recipients, alpine no longer replies to Cc recipients.
> > has anyone else noticed this? this is new behaviour.
>
> Unless the message you are replying to has a Reply-to: header, it sounds
> like a bug.
as a concrete example, here's something in my inbox:
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:32:43 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: bad reference to atheros ar71xx config variable?
i reply, *explicitly* select "reply to all recipients", and this is
the constructed header for the reply:
To : Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc :
Attchmnt:
Subject : Re: bad reference to atheros ar71xx config variable?
the linux wireless CC entry is missing. yes, that strikes me as a
bug so i'll BZ it.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
