clumens@xxxxxxxxxx writes: > We weren't correctly grabbing the filesystem that was mounted on /usr, > leading anaconda to think there was none, therefore your / is too small > to hold everything. /usr simply wasn't getting counted at all. ISTM that if someone has chopped up the filesystem into separate mounts for /home /usr /var etc, it's going to be practically impossible for the disk space check to be exactly correct anyway. We do not have numbers on how much each package puts under each top-level directory, do we? It would probably be a good idea if the not-enough-space error did not assume that it is smarter than the user, ie, do not make it a hard failure. Perhaps "This package set might require more space than you have, proceed anyway?" regards, tom lane -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
