On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 19:08 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Bob Gustafson wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 08:39 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > >> The only problem I see here is that Evolution depending on openldap was a > >> surprise to you. > > > > And 152 other packages that got whacked too.. > > You are just blaming the messenger here. Upstream software might > introduce hard dependencies or package maintainers might not have split > up the packages. Yum is just informing you of the dependencies specified > It is not responsible for the dependencies itself. > > Rahul > I'm comparing two messengers: One, with 'minimum code', which relies on the user to decide whether the dependency list to be removed contains elements which are actively used by other packages. A second, (debian's package manager), which maintains a reference count so it does not remove elements which are still in use by other packages. Which would you like to unleash on the world? -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
