On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 18:35 +0430, Adrin Jalali wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 3:44 PM, shmuel siegel > <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Obviously, some people have different criteria from you as to > what appeals to them. There is some value to knowing which > files remain to be downloaded. I personally found the pkg size > behavior more pleasing. (Seth, I thought that you would want > confirmation that you can't win) > But I will agree that "raving" is a bit extreme. > > > I myself strongly prefer packages to be downloaded alphabetically > because it's easier to see which packages are remained. It's so usable > for me as it's easier to write a script to download remaining packages > using a multi-connection download manager. I agree. I'm glad this change was made. poc -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
