On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 07:07 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Christopher Beland wrote: > > 2.) Should WORKSFORME be banned? It seems that for RHEL, the correct > > answer is never "I tried it and it worked so there's probably not a > > bug". The alternative is to push reports back as NEEDINFO until they > > are resolved as NOTABUG (if it turns out to be user error) or > > CLOSED/RAWHIDE or the bug is isolated with the reporter's help. > > Usually these cases are either 1.) there is some local state (user > > configuration, hardware, etc.) that is triggering the bug or 2.) > > different people are testing different versions. Either way, further > > testing can resolve the question. > > The way I use WORKSFORME is "the reporter cannot reproduce the bug anymore > and neither can I (or I am the reporter in the first place), but I have no > idea what fixed it". Same here, I've always used it for that too. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
