Joshua C. wrote: > 2009/3/30 Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> On 2009-03-30, 09:54 GMT, Joshua C. wrote: >>> Is ext4 "production-ready"? I know it was declared stable in >>> 2.6.28 but I still see more ext4 patches than ext3 in the >>> kernel. Maybe it's just because ext4 is newer? Is ext4 ready to >>> fully replace ext3 without any data losses? What about >>> mission-critical machines or should we wait untill 2.6.31 just >>> to be sure? >> If you have mission-critical machines, then you don't use Fedora >> for them anyway, right? ;-) Then you should install RHEL 5.3 (or >> some of its variants) which has ext4 as a Technology Preiew >> (i.e., not supported by RH yet). >> >> Make your own conclusions. However, as with all similar >> situation, no-one will do testing of your needs for you. >> >> Matěj >> >> -- >> fedora-test-list mailing list >> fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe: >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list >> > > You're right. I'm also considering switching to ext4 (home pc) with > f11 but i don't wan't to spend time figuring out what's wrong if > something really goes wrong. there are othe threads in the enternet > but no ditro is shipping with ext4 as default. And I'm wondering if > it's so much better then the good old ext3. Fedora 11 is shipping with ext4 as default. :) As to whether it's better, it is in many ways, but it's up to you to determine that for your use case of course. -Eric -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
