On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 11:40 -0400, James Laska wrote: > On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 14:34 +0300, shmuel siegel wrote: > > James Laska wrote: > > > So come join #fedora-qa this Thursday, March 26, 2009 to share your > > > Nouveau graphics test results. A Fedora live image will be available to > > > aid testing. Stay tuned for more details are available at > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Test_Days/2009-03-24. > > > > > It seems hard to imagine how filling in the test matrix should need a > > contributor's agreement (see earlier discussions about triage). If this > > is a necessary artifact of the wiki, then don't use the wiki. I believe > > that the set of testers (and hence the hardware reported) would expand > > if this requirement was dropped. > > Thanks for your concerns! > > The infrastructure team is investigating enabling an anonymous feedback > mechanism for test days. The hope is that this might address some of > your concerns around contributor feedback. My concern is that we might > not be able to reach out to the anonymous reporter for additional > information. But that certainly doesn't negate the proposal. It pays to read the remainder of the thread first. See the message from Paul Frields (https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-March/msg01172.html). Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
