After Adam's comments, I changed the advice for 2-in-1 bugs to point to the stock reply (which asks reporters to do the split), and updated that reply to be more polite and informative. So this leaves the following decisions to make at the meeting: * "Option 1", "Option 2" or other text for "How to Handle Bugs in Multiple Versions" section? * Should a check for bugs filed in upstream Bugzillas be mandatory? * Should triagers decide whether a bug should be handled upstream or by Fedora, or should this be left to package maintainers? * Should NEW triagers be asked to do NEEDINFO updates in 30 and 60 days if needed, or should this be left to triagers following the NEEDINFO checklist? * After these issues are decided, is this draft ready to go live? Suggested improvements which might be implemented before or after deployment: * Add references to GreaseMonkey buttons in checklist instructions * Make https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/StockBugzillaResponses more friendly by not using fixed-width boxes. -B. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
