On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:16 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 15:46 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > Right, exactly. I think what would be ideal is to have a similar page > > defining the status values for Fedora usage, and then nag the bugzilla > > guys to make the Status help link point to one or the other depending on > > which product (RHEL/Fedora) you were looking at a bug for ... > > Or we cam get over ourselves and figure out a way to use the same > definitions both within RHEL and within Fedora. Sure, that would work too. However, it does involve either convincing RHEL to change their process, or getting all Fedora maintainers to use the 'ERRATA', 'CURRENTRELEASE' and 'NEXTRELEASE' resolutions properly. I'm ready and willing to don my asbestos underpants and give that a shot, though, if we agree it's the best course. :) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
