seth vidal a écrit : > On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 00:11 +0900, John Summerfield wrote: >> seth vidal wrote: >> >>>> just to make sure i was working with the latest and greatest. i need >>>> to keep this box functioning for the next day or so but, after that, >>>> i'll try it again and send in the results. >>>> >>>> could it, in fact, be having only 1G of RAM? >>>> >>> not likely. >>> >>> PLEASE FILE A BUG. >> I imagine the anaconda-produced ks file and the before-update package >> list would be useful. >> >> There's probably not a lot about the hardware that's special, but the >> size of the upgrade likely is. >> > > Not really. 1500 pkgs isn't all that much, really. > > what would REALLY be helpful is the exact error messages that were on > the screen. > > -sv > > I can confirm yum update on fedora 11 alpha completely break the system there are tons of error about md5 pb et it break after a while I can't boot after it Gives message about needing fsck but doesn't explain which partition is the pb... (I mirrored two disk and created a lvm setup on top) I was also expecting the system to be able to automatically know that it needed to start the update in the good order by updating yum and rpm and autorestarting yum and rpm afterward (I think up2date used to work like that on rhel) by the way, got 4Giga of ram and plenty of disk so that not the pb. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
