On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 13:35 -0600, Jerry Amundson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Michal Jaegermann <michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:16:52AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > >> On Wed, 4 Mar 2009, Riku Seppälä wrote: > >> > > > >> > Just curious how much memory you have? I only have 1GB and I was thinking > >> > could that be the problem. > >> > http://lists.rpm.org/pipermail/rpm-announce/2009-February/000016.html > >> > >> it is, in fact, 1G. so that could be an issue? uh oh ... > > > > I doubt it. I have 512M in my test machine and I went through a > > recent transaction of around 1400 packages without any troubles. > > > > An old laptop which used to have 256M of memory was just awfully > > slow with yum updates (it does not run rawhide but Fedora). Now I > > found a fitting module, which doubled that memory, and updates got > > much faster. > > > > I would start with > > > > yum update rpm\* yum\* > > > > before going with the rest. > > I would *really*, *really* like to see yum just do that automagically! > Anyone know if that's been bz'd? > I searched, but am not patient enough right now for my 900+ bug "yum" > search, nor to fine tune it. > Like I said before - we could do it - up to a point where a new rpm and yum needs a new glibc which pulls in THE WORLD. then you're no better off. -sv -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
