On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 12:26 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > When updating today I noticed that /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/package.conf was not > updated, but rather a .rpmnew file was created. I took a look at > /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/package.conf and it doesn't look like a normal conf > file (that one might edit by hand). > My guess is that either it shouldn't be getting treated like a conf file > (and hence just be replaced) or the file should be in /etc not /lib. > Since I am not familiar with how this is used, I figured I'd run it by > here first before filing a bug. I believe it shouldn't be considered a configuration file, if I were you I'd file a bug on the package suggesting it not be marked as such. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
