On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 12:37 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 10:22 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > I can certainly say I do not have the time and quite likely the skills > > > to create patches so for me to be signing agreements is kinda crazy in > > > my opinion. But I guess I have missed the point somewhere... > > > > Regardless of all the arguments, it's clear that at present we need to > > make it more obvious that you have to sign the CLA, so I'll look into > > that. > > I have added a step to the 'how to join' page in the Bugzappers area > which specifically states to sign the CLA. > > Lalit, can you sign the CLA, please? I agree it's probably a silly > requirement for triagers, but it doesn't hurt a bit, honestly. :) I now have SUPAH ADMIN POWAZ, so I've set the group to require cla_done - so you won't be able to apply for membership until you've signed the CLA. I do agree that it seems a mite silly to require the CLA for triagers, though, so if someone wants to take that to the legal peeps and see if we can change it, that'd be fine. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
