On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yanko Kaneti wrote: >> >> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:25 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> >>> Adam Williamson wrote: >> >>>> Rahul, what are you doing to our precious volunteers? :) >>> >>> I need people to agree to the CLA before I can approve them. I routinely >>> remove people who have an account but are not in the CLA group. Perhaps FAS >>> should just shouldn't allow that. >>> >> >> Which is completely bonkers.... WTF is the substantial contribution that >> I might make while bug triging that I need to give additional rights to >> by > > Patches for example. And what's the likelihood that patches will spontaneously spew forth from triagers? :-) And, should that actually occur, can't the CLA agreement happen then? Maybe this is a case where the-way-it's-always-done might not apply. Then again, if I recall, the CLA is a pretty clear step in the sign-up process.... (I can't look right now) jerry -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
