On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:28 PM, John Summerfield <debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The original poster suggests, "Flash compatibility > should be installed by default." > > I suggest Fedora is an ideal platform to test this (lots of users, nobody > should be too surprised when things break), so why not install it whenever > firefox, konqueror, seamonkey or epiphany is installed as part of the > initial install or a later group install? Do many users have a use for flash with no video/audio support, zero possibility of video/audio support, and generally poor compatibility otherwise? (A genuine question… Gnash is hard work and I can't fault it for being not terribly compatible (cause you know— flash ain't done till gnash won't run) but while something is generally better than nothing, I don't think flash that won't ever have video is something as far as most users are concerned) -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
