On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 06:18:13PM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Mon, 2009-02-16 at 14:38 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > 1. Increase participation in Rawhide: it provides a huge benefit in > > terms of identifying issues and having them fixed quickly and early in > > the cycle. > > Agreed - rawhide has a bad rep, and lots of people tend to avoid it. It > has been improving lately, but we should keep trying out new things to > get it to the stage that anyone involved in Fedora development should be > able to run rawhide. I apologize for not having anything more substantial to bring to this conversation, but I had two points to make: 1. I'm really glad to see people looking at the purpose and goals of Rawhide and making sure that it's playing a unique and useful part in the development of Fedora. 2. I was having a conversation with a friend who recently took the Rawhide plunge on a laptop for fun, and was incredibly surprised to find everything working, and working *well*. So much so that he's continued to use it since and very excited about Fedora 11 as a result. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
Attachment:
pgplTbsPMMHfZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
