On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Saturday 14 February 2009 01:01:35 am Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Michal Jaegermann wrote: >> > This only shows that my initial reaction was waaay too mild. Try >> > 'yum remove mysql' and watch what happens. >> >> mysql is the client lib, of course a lot of stuff depends on that. >> >> But yes, you can't remove mysql-server without removing KDE. > > This is madness. The dependencies pull in mysql server, but yet its not > chkconfig'ed to actually run. So what gives? Why force a new server to > install on a stable release? And then after forcing it onto people's > machines, its not even used? If you install mysql-server standalone, is it chkconfig'ed to actually run? No. Is mysql-server a new *package*? Obviously, No. It's not *forced*, it's *dep'd*. Dep's happen. > Changes like this belong on rawhide, not F-9 stable. I disagree. I use KDE daily. KDE is well tested and support outside Fedora. I was happy to see this update. jerry -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
