On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:39:35 -0700, stan wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:54:08 -0700, stan wrote: > > > >> When I did an update by individual package today the following errors occurred. > >> > >> > >> > >> (installed) > >> Error: Missing Dependency: libpigment-0.3.so.8()(64bit) is needed by package > >> pigment-python-0.3.9-1.fc10.x86_64 (installed) > > > > > > > Track down such updates at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ > > Give'em bad karma points. > > > > The libpigment upgrade is this, > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1635 > > and it has been published without a pigment-python update, which > > is waiting here now: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-1709 > > > So does that mean I should mark it bad or not? It seems a fix is in the pipeline, so any comment is superfluous. > Correct. > And > I'm confused why yum didn't pull in pigment-python if it is already there? It has just been pushed (see the date), one day after libpigment. Prior to this reply, it still was in state "pending", that means it was waiting to be pushed into the target repository. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
