>>>>> "CB" == Christopher Beland <beland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: CB> Interesting. I also noticed I have many packages with no .fcXX CB> number, such as: It is not in any way required to use dist tags, so having packages without them is not a problem. It merely simplifies some internal maintenance issues (allowing a maintainer to use the same spec file for many releases). It is quite alright for some old packages to persist in newer releases; if a package contains nothing but unchanging data, why would it be rebuilt? It's just more to download when you upgrade. Of course, at some point we'll have to rebuild such packages to pick up new rpm features, and at that point I'd expect everything to acquire the new tag. - J< -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
