I am asking because for me visually differences are substantial. I am booting both on the same hardware (different partitions on the same machine) using "ATI Technologies Inc R300 AD [Radeon 9500 Pro]" video card. Assume also that in both cases I do not have neither 'rhgb' nor 'nomodeset' in boot options. When booting F10 at some moment a display will switch to a frame buffer making fonts used by messages really small (and if 'rhgb' is used I will see a full screen boot animation instead). That does not happen with rawhide kernels. Fonts always remain of the same size as if 'nomodeset' was present. OTOH if I will skip that option then I can pretty much expect that on the next boot my monitor will go crazy by loosing a vertical and/or horizontal sync. Most likely this will happen when a grub menu is displayed, and then a picture will start jumping all over the place, but a normal text from BIOS may also get "shakes". The only known cure is to power down a monitor (an LCD panel on a digital connection) and power it up again. I did not notice anything of that sort when booting up F10 kernels. Quite likely rawhide already killed for me one monitor. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478608 It was really an old one, so loses are rather minimal, and maybe it just decided that enough is enough but coincidences, and the other monitor behaviour, are a bit too much. Am I the only one with such observations? Michal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
