On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:40:47 -0600, Bruno wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 13:26:00 -0800, > Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > > This happens only on one machine out of 3 (1/3), so all is allright, but I was asking if anybody else also got this ? > > Why don't you use rpm to track down where the exact dependency problem is > and file a bug report to alert the maintainer in the event that they > haven't already noticed? It may be that only you see this broken dep because of problems with your machine (duplicate pkgs for example). Only somebody who looks into it in detail can find out. You're the first who should do the trouble-shooting, prior to presenting your findings and asking for comments. At least do some queries with rpm and repoquery. netbeans-platform8 in Rawhide repo: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os/Packages/netbeans-platform8-6.1-5.fc10.noarch.rpm http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/netbeans-platform8 http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/netbeans netbeans-platform8 in Fedora Build System: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6746 netbeans in Fedora Build System: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6758 The Rawhide broken dep report would notice wrong Obsoletes. What it cannot detect are old sub-packages, which are still found only on Rawhide users' installations and which cause broken deps due to missing Obsoletes. That's not the case here. netbeans-platform8 is available (inherited from F10). Btw, the quote of your Yum output is incomplete. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
