2009/1/15 Michal Jaegermann <michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:27:14PM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote: >> Antonio M <antonio.montagnani@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > No kernel 2.6.29.x is able to start any of my 3 F11 boxes. >> >> For me kernel-2.6.29-0.31.rc1.git2.fc11.x86_64 and 0.35 do work (kernels >> before that did hang on boot, crash X, ...). >> >> It could be a broken initrd, a new mkinitrd showed up in updates >> today. > > Antonio is not saying very much what really happens so no wonder > that nobody is rushing with an advice. OTOH from what he eventually > posted on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479525#c4 it > appears that this is way before initrd comes into play. What is > supposed to come on his machine(s) after > > ata2.00: configured for UDM/33 > ata2.01: configured for MWDMA2 > > is his own sweet secret. > > I thought initially that he possibly gets "crc error", which > happened to me at the same time, but apparently this is not that and > starting with 2.6.29-0.28.rc1.fc11 on my hardware current kernels > boot again. > > Michal > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > Tnx to both of you. Michael there is no my secret, as after those lines system idles and I have to do an hard reboot (unless someone suggests how to proceed in digging) And my system is fully updated (as rawhide, I mean). I wonder why kernel 28 boot fine and 2'9's no... If you have any suggestion, I will proceed to further tests: and for sure at least two out of three boxes don't boot (or complete booting..:) Any option to include??? Tnx again -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
