Michael Schwendt wrote:
> No, that is "glibc" 2.9.90-2, not "glib". Take your time, examine
> the problem, and collect details. Don't rush. It only complicates
> matters.
FYI, the relevant package here is actually glib2, not glib.
Kevin Kofler
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
