2009/1/7 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxx>: > Matej Cepl wrote: >> >> On 2009-01-06, 15:11 GMT, Brennan Ashton wrote: >> >>>>> >>>>> Agenda >>>>> >> >> May I add one more item on the agenda of the next meeting? >> >> * create #fedora-bugzappers IRC channel on Freenode (Jabber MUC would be >> an alternative, but I think Jabber is unfortunately still less common among >> Fedora users, so let's stick with the path of the least resistance), make >> it into the main IRC communication channel for bug zappers, and redirect >> all bug triagers there. >> >> The reason for splitting of our communication from #fedora-qa would be >> that discussion on #fedora-qa tends to drown into miriad messages about >> another round of running anaconda in VMWare (absolutely nothing against >> their wonderful effort which I think contributed mightily to the success of >> Fedora 10). If I want to participate in the bug zappers discussion I have >> no choice than to follow all these discussions on #fedora-qa. Given that >> I have other things to do than that (e.g., actually triage bugs ;-)), I >> usually just hope that if anybody wants me I will get PM from him, and >> ignore that channel as whole. I am afraid, that I am not the only one. >> >> I think, that even if there were just three of us in the channel (and I >> hope we could do better), it would seem to me to be more profitable than >> the current set up. >> >> Comments? >> >> Matěj >> >> > > Why dont you then take it all the way and apply for a seperated -triage > mailing list as well? > > JB At least in my opinion people involved in triage should be aware of what goes on in QA. Of the fedora mailing list fedora-test-list is relatively low traffic. As for another IRC, I understand what Matěj is saying, but even still I would not be likely to look at the channel unless pinged. --Brennan Ashton -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
