On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 07:51:56PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 22:20 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Is there any reason why yum shouldn't allow an older "installonly" > > package to be installed when you already have a newer one? > > It's undefined territory. What should the %post do? Add the older > kernel stanza as the latest one so by default you get the older kernel? Yes. > When you go off the reservation with packages, you keep all the pieces. > This includes moving your kernel beyond what your kernel module provider > has provided modules for. Ok, I understand having to deal with stuff, but I'd rather deal with the grub.conf fixups than the "lets break all yum updates" stuff. Perhaps I should file an RFE at upstream yum. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
