Re: is there a problem with sha1sum?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 13:29:16 -0500, Clyde wrote:

I've downloaded an .iso using wget and each time I run sha1sum against it I get a diferrent result, none of which is the correct one. The file is on an LV--don't know why that would matter tho. Repeated the download using the browser download capability and same result.

Any ideas?

Is this with Rawhide?

Is it reproducible with
 - md5sum
 - sha224sum, sha256sum, sha384sum, sha512sum
? ;)

Can you try other [similar] operations like running bzip2 to compress
the iso and bunzip2 to uncompress it?

Have you run memtest86 on that system?


This is rawhide, reproducible with md5sum, memtest86 runs clean; however, the same problem occurs when booted into another distro. So, I downloaded again to a newly formatted single ext3 partition and sha1sum matches. Therefore, I believe there is either a hardware problem with one of the drives that is providing a PV for the LV the problem .iso lies on, or there is a problem with lvm2. Will try some other tricks.

Thanks for the suggestions!!

--
---------------------------------
Regards,

Old Fart

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux