On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 06:21:08AM -0500, Leam Hall wrote: > On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 02:21 -0800, Mike Cloaked wrote: > > I would like to raise an issue concerning the use of SElinux that has meant > > that my decision to leave SElinux enabled and forcing in F9 and 10 for the > > first time has taken up a significant amount of time to get things working. > > It is very good to have the additional security that SElinux gives but it is > > important to pland and manage the transition from non-SElinux systems to a > > newer setup where the machines are all running with SElinux enabled. > > So far I've avoided the issue by turning SELinux off. While I think > SELinux is a great idea for advanced users and servers it seems to make > new user transitions difficult. > > I wonder if making SELinux default to "disabled" if the install selects > the Desktop/Office Suite group makes sense? Do many people have their > daily use productivity machines shared out to others? No, this would be bad. Fresh installs of F9 or F10 work just fine with SELinux enabled as a desktop system, as long as you don't try to integrate older filesystems or NFS as the OP stated. Even /home migrates cleanly with just a simple restorecon -R /home in most cases. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
