Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Seth Vidal wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
File a bug against yum see what Seth has to say..
Came across this in F9 cycle I think.,
You might need to "help" yum a bit..
yum -y update --skip-broken -x package
Start with the first then continue adding -x package until you hit
the one(s) causing this..
Then mentioned the package(s) that causes this on your bug report.
Actually, Tim does most of the skip-broken spelunking. Credit where
it is due.
Also before filing a bug - get yum 3.2.20-4.fc9 from updates-testing
and try it there. It might still fail but the debugging from that
version should be better.
Thanks,
-sv
Please install the 3.2.20-4.fc9 from updates-testing, if it fails then
make a bugzilla report and attach the output
from 'yum -d7 --skip-broken update'
Tim
Guys any reason why he cant use 3.2.20-4.fc10 build instead of
3.2.20-4.fc9 since he's on a F10 system?
Any differences between these builds?
JBG
begin:vcard
fn:Johann B. Gudmundsson
n:Gudmundsson;Johann B.
org:Reiknistofnun - University of Iceland;IT Management
adr:Taeknigardi;;Dunhagi 5;Reykjavik;;107;Iceland
email;internet:johannbg@xxxxx
title:Unix System Engineer RHCE,CCSA
tel;work:+3545254267
tel;fax:+3545528801
tel;pager:N/A
tel;home:N/A
tel;cell:N/A
url:www.rhi.hi.is
version:2.1
end:vcard
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
