On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 10:16 -0700, Christopher A. Williams wrote: > > > > Motherboard: > > > > eVGA e7100/630i > > > > This MB uses nVidia onboard GeForce 7100 video with the nForce 630i > > > > chipset. It also uses nVidia MCP73 High Definition Audio > > > > > > Do you have an X log showing what happens when you run the nv driver? > ...Correction to the above about vesa. It seems that, absent any > xorg.conf file, we DO try to load the nv driver. I think perhaps > system-config-display is just falling back to a vesa driver after > failing with nv, and is just having better luck at getting something > going. > > With that in mind, here's a version of the Xorg.0.log file that's > generated when there is no xorg.conf file present: > > ========================= > > X.Org X Server 1.5.2 > Release Date: 10 October 2008 > X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 > Build Operating System: Linux 2.6.18-107.el5xen x86_64 <snip...> > (II) NV: driver for NVIDIA chipsets: RIVA 128, RIVA TNT, RIVA TNT2, <snip...> > GeForce 6200 A-LE, GeForce 7800 GTX, GeForce 7800 GTX, <snip...> > (II) Primary Device is: PCI 00@00:10:0 > (WW) NV: Ignoring unsupported device 0x10de07e1 (GeForce 7100/nForce > 630i) at 00@00:10:0 > (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fbdev Unsupported??? (Big, Texas "Hunnnh...?") After looking at this log in detail (and googling to see others with the same card plus F9/10 and other distros having the identical problem), I guess the real question to ask is why the nv driver seems to support every nVidia card out there _except_ the GeForce 7100 series. Oversight? If intentional, why, and what can be done to include it? Happy to bugzilla this one as needed... Cheers, Chris -- ========================================= "In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is." --Yogi Berra -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list