On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 03:11:26PM +0000, Anne Wilson wrote: > On Friday 14 November 2008 15:05:10 Anne Wilson wrote: > > On Friday 14 November 2008 13:51:34 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > > Anne could you test kernel 2.6.27. 4-79 > > > and see if it works.. > > > ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=68527 ) > > > > I already had that kernel and had checked it. > > > > > Then test with 2.6.27.4-100 and see it if breaks.. > > > ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=69310 ) > > > > So I installed this one and checked it. > > > > > Wondering if -83 and or -85 are breaking this.. > > > > Results: > > > > 2.6.27.3-34 no wired or wireless connection > > 2.6.27.4-79 Wired connection ok, but WPA connection asks for WEP key > > 2.6.27.5-94 ditto > > 2.6.27.5-100 ditto > > > > (Just realised that you said 4-100 and I have 5-100 - is that what you > > intended?) > > > > Note that when the WPA connection fails it brings up a dialogue box asking > > for the WEP key. Unlike the first dialogue, this is restricted to 4 WEP > > entries - there is no option to enter a WPA key. > > > > Maybe I've already lost the kernel that was installed by the snapshot. > > That, presumably, was prior to 2.6.27.3-34 - and wireless did work, but > > wired didn't when I first installed. > > > I've just seen that I have kernel-firmware.noarch 2.6.27.5-101.fc10. > Shouldn't that match the kernel? It should be >= the kernel you have. The condition I'm trying to have you capture with the "iwlist scanning" and "nm-tool" output is the one where you get a dialog box asking for a WEP key. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
