On Wednesday 12 November 2008 19:10:32 Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 07:00:38PM +0000, Anne Wilson wrote: > > > That will be that bug report: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=413281 > > > See in particular comments #10 and #11 how I eventually forced it to > > > find correct interfaces as otherwise NM was terminally lost. > > > > Progress, of a sort. Following your lead I renamed ~/.gconf > > That sounds somewhat excessive. In ~/.gconf you possibly have quite > a bit of other information and not only NM connections. I have > thrown away only NM specific parts and restarted. > By renaming I can get back anything that is needed. > > What the !!!! > > According to the info panel it has an IP address of 10.42.45.1 - > > when the rest of the lan is 192.168.0.x. Where the heck did that come > > from? > > Are you connecting to an access point of your neighbour? With all > SSIDs around straight from factory that is not unthinkable. :-) If > not how you configured your router? > No, I don't see that at all. I gave it the ESSID and passphrase for my router. I don't see how that could possibly pick up my neighbour's connection. The info popup definitely named my ESSID. I've had it for tonight. Maybe one of us will have a brainwave overnight. Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
