On Tuesday 11 November 2008 22:47:53 Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 20:52 +0000, Anne Wilson wrote: > > Jesse, I don't care which route we go - NM is fine if we can persuade it > > to work. > > > > All I want is a fixed address when on my home LAN - and I'll accept > > reserved IP from my router's dhcp if that's easiest - and straight dhcp > > for the wifi, since that will be used at various locations. > > > > Since trying to get the cabled connection working properly (and it's > > working now, but not on my chosen IP address) I have lost the wifi > > altogether, so if you can advise me how to start from scratch that would > > probably be best. > > Well, I'd re-edit your ifcfg-eth* files and set them all back to > NM_CONTROLLED=yes. Also, I'd question why you have an eth1 file, and > perhaps remove it, if all you have is a wired and wireless. Make sure > the eth0 file still matches the right MAC address etc.. > > Then in NetworkManager you can right click the panel and edit > connections. There you should be able to define a configuration for > System eth0 complete with static addressing. This in theory should > allow it to come up at boot time with this static address and be fine. > > As to why your wireless went away, that's a different matter. Might be > worth booting a Live image and seeing if it makes any difference by > having fresh configurations in place. Referring back to the eth0/eth1 question, running 'service network status' gives Configured devices: l0 eth0 wlan0 Currently active devices: lo eth1 wmaster0 wlan0 Thos wmaster0 is something I've not met before. Anne
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
