Re: XO: Snap3 is a step backwards?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Blake St. Claire wrote:
> I haven't seen anyone else mention it.
>
> --overlay-size-mb 512 --swap-size-mb 384 (from
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestPlans/Fedora10_On_XO) is too big
> for the 4G SD. I used 384 and 256.
>
> First time power up I think the kernel had an oops while booting.
>
> Second time got as far as the login and clicked the Login button.
> After 30 seconds of nothing happening I pressed Ctrl-Alt-F2 and
> switched to text-mode getty on tty2 before the box wedged.
>
> Third time got past the login (now with  the wrong DPI) and got as far
> as the Appearances Preferences to try to reset the DPI, and also
> started a terminal before the box wedged.
>
> What do they say about doing the same thing over and over and
> expecting different results?
>
> Anyone have any better luck with Snap3?
>
> /Blake
>
>   
Actually for me Snap3 is a huge improvement for me.  Not getting any
oops messages any more and it's running much speedier.

-Justin

-- 
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Photo Sharing]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux