On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R <caf@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > A security tool that is incompatible with normal use to the > extent it must be disabled offers no real security. Perhaps > it should be an add-on for security geeks instead of a default > annoyance. +1 Yep, I say leave the question out of the installer, and default it to *disabled*. Annoyances "one-in-a-thousand"? Ha. I see 779 out of 10913 bugs (1 in 14, if you will). Considering some are legit software issues, I'd estimate one-in-a-hundred "annoyances". Where is the ROI? Have there been documented cases where SElinux stopped malicious things dead in their tracks? (outside of selinux development situations, of course...) jerry -- There's plenty of youth in America - it's time we find the "fountain of smart". -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
