On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 18:39 +0200, Antonio M wrote: > 2008/10/21 Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Dennis J. wrote: > > > >> It's obvious that the specific interaction between pulseaudio and alsa is > >> the problem in these cases but if neither of the stakeholders feel > >> particular responsible for addressing the issue then I don't see how this > >> will ever get resolved. > > > > Personally, I've not seen any dismissing of responsibility, and leveling > > such claims doesn't seem constructive to me. > > > > I can understand the frustration (ie, "fix it now!"), but fixing such issues > > is often complex, and doing it properly is the only sane way forward. For > > better or worse, that's simply a big job and a lot of work to be done (on > > all sides... testers, triagers, pkg maintainers, upstreams). > > > > -- Rex > > > > -- > > fedora-test-list mailing list > > fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe: > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list > > > > > this bug is not young, and it was already reported in F9, that > probably means that sound system has not been working in Fedora for at > least 3 months...do you know any modern OS where sound system is > bugged and you cant' play music or listen to radio???? or shall we > think that multimedia will be dropped??? let me know ....if you plan a > Release day, sound system is a must... These blanket statements don't help anything. I have personally played plenty of music on F9 and rawhide machines, so the sound system is working just fine, right ? As to the 'alsa works fine, pa doesn't' issue: pa, in particular the glitch-free stuff, is using parts of the alsa api that your regular alsa-using app is not touching, and that are therefore less well tested and expose more driver bugs. Matthias -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
