----- "Jeremy Katz" <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The big problem *ISN'T* GNOME vs XFCE. The problem is the (large)
> hit
> we take on performance with squashfs decompression. So with the
> snap1
> images, things have been changed a bit so that we can instead use the
> ext3fs and take decompression out of it. Which makes an impressive
> amount of difference
>
I'm running the new snap1 image without compression, and I'm not seeing a huge difference. It is a bit snappier, but unless I do some surgery, it still freezes once all the RAM is consumed.
I would say as for performance, on a scale of 1 to 10, you've gone from perhaps a 3 to a 4. The gains I see aren't all that spectacular, especially considering all the folks with 2 Gig cards are SOL now.
--
JB
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
