Michael Solberg wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 09:13 -0400, Jeff Weiss wrote: >> Er, on second thought there's really not much sense in eating up swap >> space. Maybe we should just turn off the cache (keepcache=0) ? > > This is definitely the best solution. > >> I suspect that means it'll always have to download headers, but >> bandwidth is more plentiful than memory on the XO :) > > It's true - I do wonder though, is it really feasible to try to do > updates on an XO? Six months from now running updates will eat at least > 512MB, either blowing out the overlay or the RAM. This will require the > user to re-burn the card. Maybe we need a different way to do updates. > > Michael. > > This is why I was really surprised when I heard we were shipping Live images. I would think an installed image with say, 1.7gb of filesystems and 256mb swap would have been the way to go. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
