On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 15:37:27 -0400, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This is actually more of a connection sense bug than an EDID bug. I'll > take another look though, I'm entirely too familiar with that code these > days. I think that part of the driver knows there is something connected to the DVI port (especially since it used to work a while back) but because the EDID info isn't what is expected this is ignored. And what I think ends up happening is that with the driver not thinking any monitor is attached that it defaults to using the VGA port. I tried looking at the driver source to figure out where it might be doing this based on th EDID information but couldn't grok that. So I ended mucking with what I could grok and forced the monitor type in a place where it was set to MT_NONE. -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
