On Thu, Oct 09, 2008 at 11:36:33AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 12:33 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > There is a small fly in this ointment. The above may work, usually, > > but very far from always. > > Perfect is the enemy of good. That is precisely the point. We are seeing attempts to replace "good" situations, where imperfections can be smoothed out by a user by changing configurations when needed, but something which pretends to be "perfect" and leaves you high and dry often enough. > Ajax has in the past asked for /anybody/ to provide him situations where > the EDID is bogus. Oh, for example see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=315320 attached to bug 460571. Are you seriously suggesting that a group participating in fedora-testing list will see an every piece of a misbehaving hardware and will see every possible configuration? Most of affected users will not bother at all before dismissing affected software as junk. Michal -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
