On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 4:37 PM, John Poelstra <poelstra@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jerry Amundson said the following on 10/06/2008 01:49 PM Pacific Time: >> Nobody had Questions/Comments/Criticisms on my suggestion to use VERIFIED. >> >> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2008-September/msg00523.html >> > > Unfortunately VERIFIED has always been understood in the context of having > "verified" that a bug is fixed so I don't think it is an option. That is > also the understood meaning for RHEL maintainers and would be confusing if > they work on both Fedora and RHEL. Good to know. Thanks. > I'm leaning more towards the idea that the "Triaged" keyword makes the most > sense because it doesn't disrupt the STATE change flow and simply adds meta > data to bug. This would also allow us to triage other components that > actually remain in state of NEW until work begins. +1 for TRIAGED. > So, who out there, feels that an additional keyword like "Triaged" would > mess up their bugs? :) > > NOTE: we are continuing to follow the triage work flow here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow and will > continue to do so. Can VERIFIED fit on BSWF image and/or text, or is not needed in the BugZapper context? If the latter, I think the item "The VERIFIED bug state is not used by Fedora." should be removed. jerry -- There's plenty of youth in America - it's time we find the "fountain of smart". -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
