(I am not sure, whether this message won't be double-posted, sorry if it is). On 2008-09-24, 02:22 GMT, Steve Grubb wrote: > Please leave my packages alone. I leave them in NEW until I've > had a chance to review them. If you change it, I may think I've > already taken some action action. Hi, Steve, I follow the discussion coming out of this message with a keen interest, but I would vote strongly (as only one of bug zappers), against any individual exceptions from the general policies described on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow I would totally welcome any comments and criticism for this workflow AS WHOLE, but if we get too much in the exception business whole process would get too complicated for volunteer bug zappers. Having said that, I totally understand that we should accommodate developer workflows as well (or in the first place?), but I am afraid that introducting CONFIRMED (or UNCONFIRMED) bug status would bring more problems than benefits. So, if you have problems to work with the workflow suggested above, I would point you to the existence of still living status ON_DEV, which is not part of any official workflow, but it still remains in our bugzilla (and it probably won't go away anytime soon). Wouldn't it be possible for you to redefine ASSIGNED as "this is bug-triaged and really on my plate to do something about it, eventually" and then use ON_DEV as "the stuff I am working on right now"? By this, we (I hope) can acommodate your needs, and still we don't have to make big changes in our bugzilla (and bug zappers workflow). Any comments? Best, Matěj -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
