John Poelstra wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to meet a (probably overly aggressive) personal goal of
having zero NEW rawhide bugs (which are not Package Reviews) by the time
of Fedora 10 GA. Along the way I thought I'd post some of the questions
and issues I see while triaging these bugs so we can all learn. I
encourage others to do the same. I've just knocked the list down to
close to 500!
If you want to join in and help the query for NEW rawhide bugs excluding
package reviews is here: http://tinyurl.com/6llac8
I just closed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446389 ;-) One
more off the list ;-)
# Should this be considered a blocker? Do we have any requirements
about being able to build all packages from source before GA?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462971
I think we do... but I can't recall where.
# does anyone have a labeled USB disk handy that could try this?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463106
I could, give me a day or two. Comment in bug.
# How should we be triaging "branch" and other CVS type requests ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463105
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463397
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463175
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463139
I don't think we should, but who am I ;-)
# This CVS request has comment saying "it is done". Can bug be closed
or where can I check to help verify and then close bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463124
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463105
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463175
Normally a Review/CVS request stays open until the package is built and
submitted to updates or lands in rawhide. If the package is only landing
in rawhide though there is no automagic bug closing (like bodhi can do
when you submit the build to updates/ or updates-testing/).
# is this critical enough to be a blocker?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463054
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463048
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463047
Here's another one I don't think is important enough to be a blocker:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462601
# This bug is assigned to a defunct email address... how will this bug
be addressed?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462671
It says in comment #2 that it is fixed as well. Should this not be
closed NEXTRELEASE (or CURRENTRELEASE?).
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
