On Mon, 2008-06-16 at 16:34 +0200, Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote: > The rpm build machinery accepted that I want an i386 binary > but the Mesa configure scripts didn't: > > ... > gcc -c -I../../include -I../../src/mesa -I../../src/mesa/main > -I../../src/mesa/glapi -I../../src/mesa/math -I../../src/mesa/tnl > -I../../src/mesa/shader -I../../src/mesa/shader/grammar > -I../../src/mesa/shader/slang -I../../src/mesa/swrast > -I../../src/mesa/swrast_setup -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 > -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables > -fvisibility=hidden -Os -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -std=c99 -ffast-math > -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -DUSE_X86_64_ASM -D_POSIX_SOURCE > -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE -D_GNU_SOURCE > -DPTHREADS -DHAVE_POSIX_MEMALIGN x86-64/xform4.S -o x86-64/xform4.o > ... > > Notice the "-m32 -march=i386" (that was added by RPM) and > "-DUSE_X86_64_ASM" that's coming from Mesa. Then Mesa's configure script is picking the wrong target script. Mesa bug, not spec bug. - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
