On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 12:32 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Gilboa Davara wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 10:53 -0500, David G. Mackay wrote: > >> I just installed the latest NetworkManager. It came up at boot, which > >> is good. > >> > >> Just for fun, I deleted eth0 in sys-config-network, then re-added it. > >> It did not set the managed by NetworkManager flag, and it did not set up > >> DNS. Are the fixes for S-C-N due soon? > >> > >> Dave > >> > >> > > > > I think I'm hitting the same problem. [1] > > S-C-N and NM doesn't seem to be in sync with each other - though it > > seems that adding DNS1/2 by hand solved the problem. > > > > - Gilboa > > [1] > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=134886 > > > > > > yes, changing s-c-n to use DNS[1-3] was too much change just after freeze. > s-c-n still uses change_resolv_conf() from /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/network-functions to update > resolve.conf. > Question is - how does it affects upgrades? Their old S-C-N-generated configuration will be using resolv.conf - which will be trashed by NM. I'd add a note about it in the F9's release notes. - Gilboa -- fedora-test-list mailing list fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
