Re: Naming convention for packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Naming convention for packages
From: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:21:43 +0530
In-reply-to: <4c37b6af0804241141u24273355oeb0f4f9d3211f7e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: Red Hat
References: <1209062293.3234.1.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4c37b6af0804241141u24273355oeb0f4f9d3211f7e0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080418)

Antonio M wrote:


is .f10 next rawhide???


Yes

Rahul

--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe:https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Naming convention for packages
  - From: Jon Stanley

References:
- Naming convention for packages
  - From: Dominik Sandjaja
- Re: Naming convention for packages
  - From: Antonio M

Prev by Date: Re: Naming convention for packages
Next by Date: Re: Can yum download to a pen-drive?
Previous by thread: Re: Naming convention for packages
Next by thread: Re: Naming convention for packages
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Photo Sharing] [Yosemite Forum] [KDE Users]

Powered by Linux