Andrew Farris wrote:
John Summerfield wrote:
Greg wrote:
is it or would it be worth skipping the Preview release an go
straight to the Release candidate?
Until I see a new kernel I can boot, I'm not going to admit there's a
suitable release candidate to be offered.
Had you tried reinstalling from one of the rawhide snapshots yet? There
It will not happen.
I might boot a .iso, but so far haven't seen a reason to look for one to
boot.
is every possibility your system has quirks that just shouldn't be there
and its preventing you getting the newer kernels working. We always say
systems that went through the early weeks of rawhide probably need
reinstalled by the end..
It's nothing to do with initial RAM disks, and it does no only happen
with Fedora/Rawhide kernels, I can reproduce it building my own kernel
from kernel.org source.
It also is reproducible with Factory, the OpenSUSE equivalent to Rawhide.
The bug, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436099, is assigned
to Alan Cox. I check it regularly, additional to watching my "bugs"
email folder and keeping an eye on new rawhide kernels.
(checks private mirror)
Oh, there's a boot.iso, built April 9.
Burns to CD. Does not find the drives on the DC7700 I bought yesterday.
I can boot the CentOS 5.1 disk on the older one, that's what I plan to
use on this system.
I mirror Rawhide nightly UTC+8:00; I don't know when the mirror I mirror
from mirrors its mirror, but there's necessarily some lag. OTOH I don't
get charged against my quota, and that's important.
Anaconda is 11.4.0.67, there are no kernel messages visible that
identify it.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Z1aaaaaaa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
