Bill Nottingham wrote:
Andrew Farris (lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx) said:
This assertion was generated after some updates finished, and I think
its something PackageKit did, although at the moment I don't know if
its PackageKit's fault or actually the Firefox/Xulrunner package's
fault. Both firefox and xulrunner updated during that operation.
Before I get this to bugzilla has anyone else seen it?
If FF/Xulrunner is updated, it generally needs restarted. We don't
have metadata/a mechanism to automatically do this yet.
Thanks Bill, I know it would usually need restarted, as most apps do, but was
wondering why it caused an assertion (not typical) when I wasn't doing anything.
It could have been an extension making some action, I don't know. I'd also
like to hear if anyone had this occur who was not using/running Firefox at the
time of update.
I won't bugzilla this unless someone else saw it, with my large extension set
there is no way of knowing at the moment whose fault it was.
--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@xxxxxxxxx> www.lordmorgul.net
gpg 0x8300BF29 fingerprint 071D FFE0 4CBC 13FC 7DEB 5BD5 5F89 8E1B 8300 BF29
revoked key 0xC99B1DF3 no longer used
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
---- ----
--
fedora-test-list mailing list
fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list
